LeSage v. Dirt Cheap Cigarettes and Beer, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Concurrence
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Chief Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the outcome of the case. I disagree, however, with the majority’s novel conclusion that the “evidentiary standards and presumptions of the parentage act [should] be used in attempting to prove [paternity]” but that the procedures and deadlines set forth in the UPA should be ignored. To my knowledge, this Court has never before condoned the practice of selective partial application of a statute, and I am unconvinced that it is necessary to do so here. Instead, I would hold that the UPA remains the exclusive mechanism, both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Matter of NocitaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Piel v. PielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Poole Truck Lines, Inc. v. CoatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State ex rel. K.R. ex rel. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.