Legal Opinion

Harnischfeger Sales Co. v. Burge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1930No. 7 Div. 956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellee recovered judgment against the Granson Construction Company and caused an execution for collection thereof to be levied on a gasoline shovel which appellant had sold to the Granson Company under á contract of conditional sale. Appellant interposed its claim as provided by section 10375 of the Code. 'Appellant’s bill, now under consideration, seeks' to set aside appellee’s judgment by default condemning the machine to the payment of appellee’s judgment against the Gran-son Company. Demurrer to the bill was sustained, after which this appeal.

That appellant’s bill states a case in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Fertilize Co. v. HinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Collier v. ParishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Faust v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Irvin v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API