Legal Opinion

Patane v. Kiddoo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1985No. Civ. 24121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Plaintiff instituted an action for refund of taxes which he claimed were illegally assessed and collected by the Employment Development Department (department) as unemployment insurance contributions for 1976. Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprived the trial court of jurisdiction over the action. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals. We shall affirm the judgment, holding that plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies is established…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ogo Associates v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bozaich v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. Department of Benefit PaymentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS, INC. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Hayman v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Kuykendall v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Farrar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API