Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Premium Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 3, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This action seeks $5,000 as damages on the theory that appellee, Premium Coal Company, breached its contract with appellant, Cockrell, by allowing persons other than appellant to haul coal produced from appellee’s mine. The contract sued upon reads:

“September 17, 1955. To Whom It May Concern. I, W. B. Gibson, have hereby received from Leonard Cock-rell the operation of Bee Tree Mine No. 2. I hereby agree to allow Leonard Cockrell the coal hauling from this operation and lessee Leonard Cockrell agrees to keep the coal hauled as long as the trucks can get over the roads.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Victoria Limestone Co. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Duff v. P. T. Allen Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. GH BABER v. LayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  4. Springton Coal Company v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hale v. Cundari Gas Transmission Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API