Legal Opinion

Hatcher v. Smith & Gordon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions is not duly certified must prevail. The question, in this case, is governed by the code, not by the act of 1889. The bill of exceptions states that “ The recitals of facts contained in said motion for new trial are true and correct.” The certificate of the judge affirms, in effect, that some óf them are not true, and says expressly that “ the court does not approve of the 11th and 14th grounds of the motion for new trial ” in certain specified particulars. The writ of error is a unit, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. McBride & Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  3. Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Bentley v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Musgrove v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API