Legal Opinion

Scott v. Millard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

Suit upon a note governed by the law merchant. One of the defendants resided in Tippecanoe, and others in Vigo county. All were served with process. Rule taken for answer. . Judgment by default.

The suit was rightly instituted in Tippecanoe county, as one of the defendants resided in that county. 2 R. S. p. 34, § 33. — 1 id. p. 379, § 16. The Court, therefore, had jurisdiction of the parties, as well as' of the subject-matter.

• An objection is taken that the record does not appear to be signed by the Circuit judge. The statute, does not require the signature of the judge to be repeated after…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Adams v. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Dean v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API