Legal Opinion
Daniman v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1959Published
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
In this article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding, one Blau moves for an order relieving him from the terms of a stipulation, and further asks that the stipulation he vacated insofar as it applies to him.
By cross motion, respondent moves for an order denying the present application and directing that an order heretofore entered in this proceeding be resettled so as to provide that the present moving party, Blau, be bound thereby.
The facts in this case closely parallel those in Shlakman v. Board of Higher Educ. (5 Misc 2d 901, [Hart, J.]).
The original article 78 proceeding was brought by a number…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Daniman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Horton v. . CantwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.