Freedman v. Centre Shopping Plaza, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This is an action against several defendants in which it is alleged that they “jointly and/or [sic] severally” engaged the named plaintiff to obtain leases and a commitment on a mortgage for a proposed shopping center. It appears from the record and is conceded by the plaintiffs that the moving defendant, who has appeared specially, is a nonresident, that no personal service of process was made on him and that no property in which he has any interest has been attached. Under these circumstances a motion to erase from the docket is approved procedure, notwithstanding the provisions of § 80 (1)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Felletter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Bishop v. VoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Fisher, Brown & Co. v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.