Legal Opinion

Non-She-Po v. Wa-Win-Ta

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Umatilla : Stephen A. Lowell, Judge. Suit by Non-she-po against Wa-win-ta-la-yeckt to determine an adverse claim to realty in which defendant prevailed.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

1. 'This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a complaint in a suit, under section 504 of the statute (Hill’s Ann. Laws), to determine an adverse claim to real estate. The parties are Indian women belonging to the Umatilla and Walla Walla tribes, respectively; both residing upon the Umatilla Reservation. The real property in controversy is a forty-acre tract of such reservation, in possession of the plaintiff, allotted, under the act of March 3, 1885 (23 Stat. c. 319), to one George Pearson, who died prior to the commencement of the suit, leaving no lineal descendants, and neither a wife nor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Abney v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams Et Ux. v. CapparelliOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re Estate of MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Porter v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sargent v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re Estate of MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API