Bantz v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
864 P.2d 618 (1993)
124 Idaho 780
Merrie Jo BANTZ and Kirk Bantz, Individually and as Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Neal T. Bongard, E.L. Murphy Trucking Co., and Carrier's Insurance Company of Iowa, all by and through the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association, a quasi-governmental entity, created by the laws of the state of Minnesota, Defendants, and
MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation authorized to do business in the state of Idaho, on Behalf of C. Benjamin HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant,
North Pacific Insurance Company, an Oregon corporation authorized…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.