Legal Opinion

Dietrich v. J.I. Case Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1990No. 81 and 82PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

These are appeals from a judgment and delay damages entered following a jury verdict for plaintiffs in a products liability action. Defendant below, J.I. Case Company (Case), appeals Orders denying its post-trial motions, molding the verdict against it to include delay damages, and entering judgment.1

*478This case arises from a design defect in a machine called a “mini-sneaker,” manufactured by Case. The machine was designed as a “compact self-held cable plow for direct burial of telephone, gas service, cable T.V., electrical, irrigation and sprinkler system installations.” The “mini-sneaker”…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Sherk v. DAISY-HEDDON, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Roselli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Yohannon v. Keene Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API