Legal Opinion

Gore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1953No. 11878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On this appeal, the convicted defendant charges that he was deprived of his constitutional rights, under the Sixth Amendment, to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

The charge is not well grounded in fact. The district judge appointed a competent attorney to represent appellant, who asked that the court discharge the appointed attorney. He did not ask for a substituted attorney, but expressed a preference to represent himself. Attorneys representing other defendants in the case stated to the court that, with the the consent of appellant, they would stand ready to guard his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Burstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Woolard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stegall v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1957
  2. Thomas White Gore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API