Legal Opinion
APT Minneapolis, Inc. v. Eau Claire County
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 30, 1999No. 99-C-609-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
Plaintiff APT Minneapolis, Inc. is a provider of wireless telecommunications services that wants to build a 165-foot communications tower on one of the highest points in the city of Eau Claire, a hill known as Mt. Tom. The city of Eau Claire agreed with plaintiffs plan, and even leased the company the land on which to build the tower, but the Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals threw a wrench in the works when it denied plaintiffs application for a variance from a law that restricts the height of structures in areas near the airport. (Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- John C. Aegerter and Air Page Corp. v. City of Delafield, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Western PCS II Corp. v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- VoiceStream Minneapolis, Inc. v. St. Croix CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- APT Pittsburgh Ltd. Partnership v. Lower Yoder TownshipDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. City of MequonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. St. Croix CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Laurence Wolf Capital Management Trust v. City of FerndaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.