Legal Opinion

Sinsheimer v. William Skinner Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1894Published

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.

1OpinionJustice Waterman

on rehearing.

In a petition for rehearing it is suggested that the true doctrine is, that “ when it appears on the face of the declaration that any other person than the one who is sued, is liable, no plea in abatement is necessary,” and the case of Swigart v. Weare, 37 Ill. App. 258, is referred to as sustaining such petition. We do not think that Swigart v. Weare is authority for the doctrine for which appellant contends. It is an imperative rule that all living promisees, whose interests are joint, must be joined as plaintiffs. This is because if,, upon a promise of five, three only bring…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jansen v. GrimshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Wright v. PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
  3. National Bank of Oshkosh v. Jennings Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  4. Swigart v. WeareAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API