Goldman v. Rosen

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald Lebovits, J.

*779Following this court’s decision and order after trial of July 29, 2005 (see Goldman v Rosen, 8 Misc 3d 1020[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51206[U] [Hous Part, Civ Ct, NY County 2005]), petitioner moves and respondent cross-moves for various relief. The court consolidates for disposition both the motion and the cross motion.

Petitioner moves for orders (1) setting a date certain for a hearing to determine the amount of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements to which petitioner is entitled as the prevailing party under the court’s July 29 judgment, and (2)…