Legal Opinion

Klein v. Hilton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1944No. 225PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

This is a landlord-tenant case. Plaintiff sued for possession of a dwelling house, claiming that she required the property for the immediate purpose of making substantial alterations and remodeling, a ground on which a landlord may recover possession under the Emergency Rent Act.1 Trial was by jury and resulted in verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1. Defendant contends the trial judge should have required plaintiff to “elect” whether the work of remodeling would be performed by the National Housing Agency or by a private builder, with both of whom…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gould v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. McFadden Securities Co. v. Stoneleigh Garage, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tatum v. TownsendDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Conrad v. PisnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API