Legal Opinion
Eustace v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 4, 2018No. Case No. 5D17–2465Published
1Per curiam
We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beau Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016