Legal Opinion · Dissent

Idom v. Weeks & Russell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1924No. 23686Published

1DissentEthridge, J.

I dissent from the opinion of the majority in so far as it holds that the record warranted a peremptory instruction in favor of J. D. Weeks, one of the partners, but agree with the majority as to Russell’s liability. Russell was the managing partner of the business, and had general control of the drug store. Dr. Weeks sometimes assisted in the business, but was engaged in the practice of medicine, and was not regularly in the store.

As stated in the majority opinion, there had been some burglaries in the town of Ackerman, and rumours of others to be committed, and on the evening prior to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Heirn v. M'CaughanMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Magar v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Childers v. Southern Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API