Legal Opinion
State v. Beal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 2014No. 13-KA-925PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge.
| ¡.On appeal, defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm and, due to an error patent, remand for correction of the commitment.
Facts and Procedural History
In this case, defendant’s conviction resulted from a guilty plea so the circumstances surrounding the charged offense *126were gleaned from the record, including testimony presented at defendant’s suppression hearing. The record reflects that, on December 5, 2011, defendant was arrested for possession of heroin, in violation of La. R.S.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HarrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018