Legal Opinion

Morano v. Norman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1956No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The injuries sustained by the plaintiff in this case, James Morano, grimly portray how a highway becomes a shambles when motorists drive their steel and iron vehicles against the non-resistant flesh, bone and cartilage of human beings. As the result of an accident, of which he was the victim, Morano has lost complete articulation of speech and at the trial could reply to questions only with head-shakings, gesticulations and guttural sounds.

The accident was the common intersectional collision where two vehicles, approaching from different directions, fought for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Wilt v. BlazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. BockmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Williams v. Scott-Smith Cadillac Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API