Denny v. Guyton
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion
ON Motion FOR Rehearing.
ATWOOD, J.
— In their motion for a rehearing respondents insist that under the pleadings appellant is not entitled in any event to participate in profits made in the business of furnishing horses and mules to the British Government and other belligerent allied powers engaged in the World War after March 1, 1916, the date of the sale agreement between J. C. Wolcott and J. D. Guyton. A brief survey of the record pertinent thereto will disclose the fallacy of such a claim.
Plaintiff’s amended petition alleged that it was “agreed that the said joint adventure should continue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Castleman v. CastlemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Crecelius v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Bartlett v. McCallisterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Schroeder v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.