Legal Opinion

United States v. Allan Blume, Toby Pett, Roger Ward, David Bianchini

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 10, 1992No. 955, Docket 91-1570Published

1Opinion of the Court

967 F.2d 45

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Allan BLUME, Toby Pett, Roger Ward, Defendants,

David Bianchini, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 955, Docket 91-1570.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 28, 1992.

Decided June 10, 1992.

Thomas D. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Charles A. Caruso, U.S. Atty., D. Vt., David V. Kirby, Chief, Crim. Div., of counsel), Burlington, Vt., for plaintiff-appellee.

Kimberly Homan (Zalkind, Sheketoff, Wilson, Homan, Rodriguez & Lunt, Norman S. Zalkind, David Duncan, of counsel), Boston, Mass., for defendant-appellant.

Before: LUMBARD, NEWMAN,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Newman; Concurrence · Winter.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API