Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Hinsdale Women's Clinic

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1996No. 1 — 94 — 3345Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully

Plaintiff, Roy David Peterson (hereinafter Roy), as father and next friend of Daniel Roy Peterson (hereinafter Daniel), a minor, filed this action in the circuit court of Cook County against defendants Hinsdale Women’s Clinic and Dr. Donald A. Amsler, seeking damages for extraordinary medical expenses that will be incurred in raising Daniel as a result of defendants’ failure to diagnose and treat the rubella or German measles contracted by Daniel’s mother in 1977 during her pregnancy.

Plaintiff’s original complaint, filed on July 20, 1990, alleged claims of wrongful life against these and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toombs v. City of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Arnold Engineering, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dace International, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Janetis v. ChristensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. McGinnis v. A. R. Abrams, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API