Renner v. Sentle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
The action 'is by husband and wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife. The verdicts were $350 for the wife and. $300 for the bus- band. They appeal from the refusal of their motion for new trial. They complain that the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury to reduce to its present worth any allowance to the wife for future pain and suffering and any allowance to the husband for future loss of the wife’s society, services and companionship. They contend these erroneous instructions are responsible for their inadequate verdicts.
It is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- O'Hara v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Yost v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Kerns v. RipkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Boley Boley v. Glassport Bor.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borzea v. AnselmiWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Schneider v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bradshaw v. RawlingsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Rohland v. NagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Glasgow, A. v. Ducan, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.