Toto v. PRINCETON TP.

962 A.2d 1150 (2009)

404 N.J. Super. 604

Fernando TOTO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PRINCETON TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Respondent.

DOCKET NO. A-0216-07T3.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued telephonically September 17, 2008.

Decided January 15, 2009.

Richard M. Schall, Moorestown, argued the cause for appellant (Schall & Barasch, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Schall and Patricia A. Barasch, on the brief).

Trishka Waterbury, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent (Mason, Griffin & Pierson, P.C., attorneys; Ms. Waterbury, of counsel; Michael R. Butler, on the brief).

Before Judges WINKELSTEIN,…