Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bagnall v. Town of Beverly Shores

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1999No. 64A05-9704-CV-138Published

1DissentRucker, Judge

The trial court properly dismissed the Bagnalls’ writ petitions. I disagree with the majority’s contrary view. Concerning petitions 1 and 3 the majority finds dispositive the case of Board of Zoning Appeals v. Elkins, 659 N.E.2d 681 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), trans. denied. I cannot agree because El-kins stands for the proposition that notice need not be perfected within thirty days. In fact our supreme court opinion upon which Elkins relies specifically holds “[t]o require the actual service of notice within thirty (30) days after the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals would read into the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shipshewana Convenience Corp. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Board of Zoning Appeals v. ElkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Porter v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API