Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foy v. Austin Capital Management, Ltd.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2013No. 34,013; Docket No. 31,421Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Chief Judge.

{1} New Mexico’s Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 44-9-1 to -14 (2007) (FATA or the Act) was passed in 2007. The next year, Plaintiffs filed a qui tarn action under the Act alleging violations that occurred as early as 2003. Although these alleged acts predate the effective date of FATA, they fall within the period provided for in FATA’s retroactivity provision, Section 44-9-12(A) (applying the Act to violations occurring from 1987 forward). Defendants argued that FATA’s retroactivity provision violates the federal and state Ex Post Facto Clauses and is…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API