Legal Opinion

Perotti v. Stine

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2007No. 2006-2359PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for writs of habeas corpus, coram nobis, and audita querela. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} In September 2006, appellant, John W. Perotti, an inmate in a federal prison in Kentucky, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County for writs of habeas corpus, coram nobis, or, in the alternative, audita querela. See Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Ed.2004) 141 and 362, which defines “audita querela” as a “writ available to a judgment debtor who seeks a rehearing of a matter on grounds of newly discovered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Scanlon v. BrunsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Perotti v. Neocc, Unpublished Decision (7-25-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Rowland v. FinkelOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Collins v. KilbaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. Melendez-PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. UsheryOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Anderson v. LaroseOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Carley v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API