Legal Opinion

Goings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1984No. 47979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Rule 27.26 motion dismissed without an evidentiary hearing. The sequence of events mandates reversal and remand for appointment of counsel.

4-21-83 — Pro se. Rule 27.26 motion filed and Ted Guberman, Public Defender appointed to represent movant.

5-25-83 — Frank K. Carlson, as attorney for movant, filed a request for a transcript.

7-11-83 — Ted Guberman notified of State’s motion to dismiss.

7-14-83 — Frank K. Carlson filed motion for leave to withdraw. On the motion was a notation to notify Carlson to be here for hearing of motion to dismiss on 7-26-83. There was another…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. DalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Webster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API