Legal Opinion

Hines v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. 54786PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

This is a subjectively disgusting case of the sexual battery of a young nine year old girl by a now 24 year old man. Most substantially proved was the Defendant's use of his penis to penetrate his victim anally. Less substantial but nevertheless credible evidence also suggests vaginal and oral penetration. Here as in other cases we are bound on our oaths that we suppress our visceral reactions to these facts and adjudicate this appeal by reference to rules of law objectively ascertained and applied — and that alone.

The acts involved here have been made unlawful by an enactment of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. May v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pearson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Shearer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Peterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Perkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Harbin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Whittington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API