Legal Opinion

Oberg v. Berg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1916No. 13012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prater, J., entered February 26, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant by direction of the court, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Oberg, seeks recovery of damages which he claims resulted to him from the negligence of the defendant, Berg, in that he left his automobile upon Union street, in Seattle, in such an insecure position that it started by the force of gravity alone and ran over the plaintiff, inflicting upon him injuries for which he seeks recovery. At the conclusion of all the evidence, upon motion of counsel for the defendant, the trial judge directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant, which was accordingly done and judgment entered thereon, from which the plaintiff has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wodnik v. Luna Park Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lewinn v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Vincent v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Berman v. SchultzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maloney v. . KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Garis v. EberlingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Qualls v. Golden Arrow Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Shepherd v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Gresser v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API