Feist v. Feist

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Thomas Feist appeals and Cheryl Feist cross-appeals from a district court divorce judgment dividing the parties’ marital estate. Because we conclude the district court did not clearly err in equitably distributing the parties’ marital estate and awarding all of the mineral interests to Cheryl Feist and did not abuse its discretion in failing to award attorney fees to Cheryl Feist, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The parties were married in 1971 and divorced in 2013. The parties have two children together who have both reached the age of majority. During the marriage, Cheryl Feist…