Legal Opinion

People v. Bergeson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1994No. 2—92—0644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Defendant, Stanley Bergeson, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, of disorderly conduct (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 26 — l(a)(l) (now 720 ILCS 5/26 — 1(a)(1) (West 1992))). Defendant contends that (1) the complaint is too vague and ambiguous to charge an offense and (2) the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The State filed an amended complaint charging defendant with disorderly conduct in that he “knowingly looked into the window of Jennifer Ensign in such an unreasonable manner as to alarm and disturb Jennifer Ensign and provoke a breach of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. PodhraskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. People v. LuttrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. B.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re BCIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. B.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API