Darmento v. Pacific Molasses Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative.
This is a negligence action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff Anthony M. *987Darmento was driving and his wife, plaintiff Matilda T. Darmento, was a passenger. Plaintiffs contend that as they were driving south on State Route 13, which was icy, slippery and covered with snow, defendant Walter J. Finlay negligently operated the 31-ton tractor-trailer owned by defendant Pacific Molasses Co. in that he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Darmento v. Pacific Molasses Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stonehill Capital Management LLC v. Bank of the WestNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cohen v. MastenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Bush v. Lamb-Grays Harbor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Graham v. Courtesy Transportation Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.