Legal Opinion
NORTHEAST GEORGIA CANCER CARE v. Blue Cross
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 28, 2012No. A11A1871, A11A1872PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
Relying on the “Any Willing Provider” statute codified at OCGA § 33-20-16 (the “AWP statute”), Georgia’s Commissioner of Insurance ruled that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. (“Blue Cross”) was required to admit “any willing provider” that wished to join its preferred provider arrangement, and that Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc. (“BC Healthcare”) was required to admit “any willing provider” that wished to join its health maintenance organization.1 The superior court reversed the Commissioner. Northeast Georgia Cancer Care, LLC and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pruitt Corp. v. Georgia Department of Community HealthSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. State Revenue CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- City of Buchanan v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Northeast Georgia Cancer Care, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Footstar, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monumedia II, LLC v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Forsyth CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Spectera, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Equipco International, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Arthur E. Ferdinand, as Fulton County Tax Commissioner v. Fulton County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.