Legal Opinion

Jackowitz v. Tingle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1958No. 37370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. Where, as in this case, the plaintiff filed an amendment to the petition which materially changed the nature of the petition, a previous judgment overruling a general demurrer to the original petition did not preclude the defendant from demurring generally to the petition as amended. Code § 81-1312; Green v. Spires, 189 Ga. 719, 721 (7 S. E. 2d 246).

2. Where, as in this case, the plaintiff filed a suit in personam against the defendant, based upon a mortgage to secure a debt, the petition is subject to general demurrer. “The. object of a mortgage is to secure a debt with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. SpiresSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Carmichael v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Alropa Corporation v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Small Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Banks v. Employees Loan & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Porter v. Midland-Guardian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Jackowitz v. TingleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API