Legal Opinion

Reffett v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1990No. 69A01-9003-CR-95PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Marvin Reffett appeals the denial of his Motion to Correct Erroneous Sentence. 1 The case calls upon us to rule on the proper role of presentence reports in negotiated plea agreements in felony cases, and the specific issue before us is whether a trial court can accept a plea agreement without first having reviewed the defendant’s presentence report. We hold that it cannot, and therefore affirm.

FACTS

Reffett was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated, second or subsequent offense, a Class D felony. 2 On August 9, 1988, Reffett’s negotiated plea…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lacy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Phillips v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Carlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reffett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Callahan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Nesses v. Specialty Connectors Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API