Legal Opinion

State v. Schmitt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 14, 1988No. 87-0836PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Carl Schmitt d/b/a Carl Schmitt Sanitary Landfill appeals from a judgment requiring him to pay $202,550 in forfeitures and $30,382 in penalty assessments. The issues are: (1) whether the forfeitures were proportionate to the offenses; (2) whether Schmitt is liable for multiple violations on the same day; (3) whether the total forfeiture was impermissibly punitive. We conclude that: (1) the forfeitures were proportionate to the offenses; (2) the trial court properly found Schmitt liable for multiple violations on the same day with regard to some violations but not for others; (3) Schmitt has…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Chrysler Outboard Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. C. Spielvogel & Sons Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Morke v. Record CustodianCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  4. State v. DeSantisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. State v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API