Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Sevier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 7, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, C. J.

Prohibition: Relator seeks to prohibit respondent from passing upon a motion filed by the Central Missouri Trust Company, in which it asks the respondent to make an order directing it to pay to the relator the money it now has on deposit growing out of the restitution proceedings in the Aetna Insurance Company case, commonly known as the 10 per cent insurance rate reduction ease.

Seventeen years ago the then Superintendent of the Insurance Department (hereinafter called the Superintendent) ordered a ten per cent reduction in fire insurance rates in this State. Under stipulation and by court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Abeille Fire Insurance v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Aetna Insurance v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Aetna Insurance v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Davison v. HoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. DentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. ThorpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Phelps v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Lucas v. Central Missouri Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Wakefield v. ThorpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. American Ins. Co. v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API