Legal Opinion

James Naff Gibson v. George Ortiz, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2004No. 18-35789PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Warden George Ortiz appeals the district court’s grant of the writ of habeas corpus to petitioner James Naff Gibson. The district court found that the use of California Jury Instruction, Criminal (“CALJIC”) No. 2.50.01, which pertains to evidence of prior sexual offenses, allowed the jury to find Gibson guilty of the charged offenses by relying on facts found only by a preponderance of the evidence. This lessened burden of proof violated Gibson’s due process rights under In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), which requires the prosecution to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. People v. LindbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Doe v. BusbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. People v. McCurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. LoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API