Legal Opinion

Estate of Weitzel v. Cuyahoga Falls.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1999No. 1998-0190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 200.] ESTATE OF WEITZEL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Estate of Weitzel v. Cuyahoga Falls,

1999-Ohio-24.] Tort reform—Am.Sub.H.B. No. 350—Appellate procedure—Final appealable orders—Sovereign immunity—Amendment to R.C. 2501.02 and newly enacted R.C. 2744.02(C)—Judgment of court of appeals affirmed on authority of State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward. (No. 98-190—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided November 17, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Portage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Burger v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Burger v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API