Legal Opinion

Chao v. City of Waterloo

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1984No. 69525PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

We have granted the City of Waterloo (city) permission to take this interlocutory appeal from several orders entered by the district court dismissing the city’s cross-appeal in a condemnation proceeding. We conclude that the city’s notice of cross-appeal and amended cross-petition were sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the district court and give notice of the relief it was entitled to seek. We therefore reverse and remand.

As part of a project to extend a parking ramp, the city initiated condemnation procedures to obtain a parcel of real estate in downtown Waterloo.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Atlantic Veneer Corporation v. SearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Ackerman v. LauverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Carmichael v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Johnston v. Percy Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. John Baker and Valerie Baker v. City of Iowa City, Iowa and Iowa City Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Neylan v. MoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Rife v. D.T. Corner, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Ellwood v. Mid States Commodities, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API