Commonwealth v. Kent
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.
¶ 1 Raymond M. Kent appeals from the order denying his petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. We remand for appointment of counsel and grant Kent leave to file his direct appeal nunc pro tunc within thirty days of appointment of counsel.
¶ 2 Kent raises a number of issues on appeal, but we need only address one. Kent claims he was denied counsel on direct appeal and, as a result, he lost his direct appeal rights. A brief recitation of the facts is in order.
¶ 3 Evidence indicated Kent and his sister had some beers and smoked crack cocaine on the night of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. PaysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. CiptakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Com. v. Blank, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Johnston, C., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Jorge, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Sanches, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- SANCHES v. CLARKDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020