Helm v. Short
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 63 — APPEAL IN ROAD CASE APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 3 Metcalfe, 71, Phillips v. Tucker. 3 Metcalfe, 188, Craig v. North. 1 Duvall, 163, Robinson v. Robinson. Civil Code, sections 30, 31, 33, 519, 849. Ms. Opinion, February, 1858, Pointer v. Curd. 3 Metcalfe, 384, Bond v. Mullins. Revised Statutes, chapter 84, 3 Stanton, 394.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion oe the court.
Upon the petition of over one hundred and thirty citizens of Hardin County, including the appellees, Short, Gaither, and Hansboro, commissioners were appointed by the county court of said county to make the necessary examination and report the facts connected with a proposed change in the public road leading from Elizabethtown to the town of Litchfield, inGrayson County. Their report having been returned, the appellants, Henry B. and Mary Helm, over whose land the change was proposed to be made, were duly summoned, and upon their motion a writ…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Green River Fuel Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Harrison v. Lebanon Water-worksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
- Winn v. Carter Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Kentucky Heating Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Autry v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.