Legal Opinion
City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 2016No. 1228 C.D. 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge BONNIE BRIGANCE .LEADBETTER.
The City of Pittsburgh appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that affirmed a Supplemental Interest Arbitration Award (the Supplemental Award). That award modified the parties’ Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) by inserting a non-residency clause. We reverse. -
The Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 (FOP) and the City were parties to a CBA covering the term January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014. Section 18(S) of that CBA provided:
[I]f the Pennsylvania State Legislature enacts legislation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- The Honorable v. Spencer, Mayor of the City of Reading v. City of Reading Charter BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Wecht v. RoddeyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- City of Butler v. City of Butler Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- City of Wilkes-Barre v. City of Wilkes-Barre Police Benevolent Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017