Legal Opinion

Skilton v. Coddington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Special Term, Ontario County. Action by Raphael M. Skilton, as sole surviving partner of the firm of T. J. & R. M. Skilton, against Charles S. Coddington, as trustee in bankruptcy, etc., and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant Coddington appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. The action was brought to establish and enforce a lien upon personal property. The facts appearing from the record are, in brief: That the Skilton firm, October 4, 1897, sold and delivered to the defendant Barron a stock of goods at the agreed price of $6,000, of which $2,000 was paid down, $1,500 was paid by an accepted order, and the remaining $2,500 was put in a note made by Barron, dated that day, and payable to the Skiltons, at Geneva National Bank, five years from date, with interest semiannually, with privilege of paying any part of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skilton v. CodingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re PlanzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Pontiac Buggy Co. v. SkinnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1908
  3. In re PurtellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API