C. I. T. Corp. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentFelton, J.
A plaintiff can never be entitled to recover in a trover suit in the absence of proof of a conversion or something equivalent thereto. The Code, § 107-101, declares: “In actions to recover the possession of chattels, it shall not be necessary to prove any conversion of the property where the defendant is in possession when the action is brought.” If this section applies to trover suits, it has never been construed to mean literally what it says. It is construed to mean that proof of conversion may be dispensed with in eases where the defendant is in possession claiming the property as his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barbour v. Day Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927