Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Reehling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1889No. 13,934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

The appellees, Sophia Reehling,Charles F. Rapp and Frederick Holzer, filed their complaint in the Allen Circuit Court against Rosina Rapp, Catherine Fisher, “and the children of Frederick Rapp, now living, whose names are unknown,” for the partition of certain real estate, averring ownership of the same as follows: One-fourth in the plaintiffs, one-half in the appellant, Rosina Rapp, and one-eighth in Catharine Fisher, and one-eighth in the children of Frederick Rapp, now living. A summons was issued in the cause, and served upon the appellant in June, 1886. Afterwards, in July, 1887, an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cool v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Pattison v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cameron v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Stanley v. GiesekingIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hodgin v. HodginIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hawley v. Huntington County State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Freeth v. RuleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API