Gevinson v. Kirkeby-Natus Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Breitel, J. P.
This appeal raises the question whether plaintiffs should be required to detail in a bill of particulars the statutes and decisional law of a sister State upon which they rely. A lesser question is whether plaintiffs should be required to particularize similarly the methods and computations by which they support their several claims for general damages.
The action is one for conversion of property, consisting of real property, shares of corporation stock, interests in limited partnerships, and other property. The property had been assigned as collateral in connection with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pfleuger v. PfleugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Wolff v. HubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eccles v. Shamrock Capital Advisors, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
- Byrne v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Government Employees Insurance v. SheerinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Burns v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rothstein v. City UniversityNew York Court of Claims · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.