Legal Opinion

Thurston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1990No. 56787PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. Movant was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and assault in the second degree. He was sentenced as a prior offender to fifteen years, life, and five years to run consecutively on the respective counts. We affirmed mov- ant’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Thurston, 735 S.W.2d 108 (Mo.App.1987).

The standard of review for a Rule 29.15 motion is limited to determining whether the motion court’s findings,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Donald Kilsmuth Hess and Louis Clifton Hess. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Robert HutchingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Hubler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. SumlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Jones v. CookseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API